Industry Leadership Group

The Industry Leadership Group has been established in 2026. It’s composed of senior leaders from across the industry. It’s empowered to consider whole-system, whole-industry costs, as well as taxpayer and passenger impacts. This group has the authority, capability and accountability to lead industry decision-making on railway standards.
The group plays a leading role in driving industry to take the best long-term decisions in a timely manner. It provides direction, advice, and guidance to standards committees and RSSB.
Note: This section will be updated in early 2026 with a list of the Industry Leadership Group members and their remits.

Cost Attribution Committee

The Cost Attribution Committee is the senior stakeholder group that settles costs between affected industry parties when the Industry Leadership Group makes decisions that may have costs or commercial consequences.
This committee is a subgroup of the Industry Leadership Group. It meets independently and is convened only when there are costs or commercial consequences to be settled between industry parties.
Note: This section will be updated in early 2026 with a list of the Cost Attribution Committee members and their remits.

RSSB

RSSB oversees the operations of standards committees. It liaises with the Industry Leadership Group, informing them of issues with significant implications for the mainline railway. It monitors the effectiveness of RSSB-developed standards and supports the prioritisation and resource allocation for their development.

Standards committees

Standards committees are expert cross-industry groups overseen by RSSB. They are composed of experts representing different industry categories.
Each committee oversees a railway subsystem and its interface with other subsystems. Their primary purpose is to advise, prioritise and approve decisions related to railway standards.
Standards committees take decisions by consensus. This involves all members participating in discussions, providing their views and reconciling conflicting arguments. They do this considering the long-term interest of the railway system as a whole.