How to enter
We have worked to ensure the entry process is as efficient and practical as possible, allowing for easy access for all water companies, particularly smaller ones.
Winning entries will be selected following the assessment process outlined below:
- A. Entry Period
- B. Eligibility Screening
- C. Assessment
- D. Judging, including live Q&A
- E. Ofwat Decision
- F. Award
- G. Feedback
A. Entry Period
The Catalyst Stream opened for entries on 8 September 2025 at 12 noon (BST) and closes on 6 January 2026 at 12 noon (GMT).
Changes to the entry form
Based on feedback from the previous round, we have updated the entry form to improve entrant experience and improve the gathering of information about entries to aid assessors and judges in their decision making. The main changes to the entry form are detailed below.
Terminology change: Going forward entries will need to demonstrate how they benefit ‘customers, communities and the environment’ (a change from ‘customers, society and the environment’)
Updates to entry questions and criteria
Entry form guidance has been updated and the flow of the questions has been strengthened based on feedback from previous rounds, to enable smoother completion of the form.
Unassessed Questions
Further guidance has been included on responsibilities of the main contact to ensure that the right person is chosen for this role.
Columns have been added to the partner contacts template to gather information on whether partners count as a Small and Medium Sized Enterprise, and whether they are a UK Incorporated Entity. Guidance has been added to the entry form to support this. This data is for reporting use only and has no bearing on the assessment of the entry.
Assessed Questions
You can now upload pitch decks separately from the main submission, and the guidance on providing visuals has been made clearer.
Assessed Criteria
Criterion 1: A new question 1.2.2 has been added about the intended outputs of the entry (see definitions below). The strategic themes have been removed, and the associated criterion has been eliminated. Due to these changes, the word count for this criterion has increased by 50 words.
Criterion 2: A new sub-criterion (2.2) now focuses on how the lead entrant and their partners plan to develop and implement the innovation, separate from its wider adoption in the water sector. Because of this and some other minor changes to questions, the word count for this criterion has increased by 600 words.
Criterion 3: The guidance for 3.1 has been updated to clarify what is being assessed, with additional guidance about this included in this handbook under the section Senior sponsorship of the entry and innovation. A question around plans for dissemination has been moved from 3.2 into 2.3. A word count has now been added to question 3.5.1. As a result of these changes and some other minor changes to questions in this criterion, the word counts has increased slightly by 100 words.
Criteria Weighting
Although the above changes have not resulted in a change to the weighting across the main criteria 1, 2 and 3. there are changes to the weighting of some of the sub-criteria. Please review the criteria weighting carefully when completing your entry.
Inputs, Outputs, Outcomes and Impacts
This round, the entry form makes more mention of these, and their definitions are as follows:
- Inputs The resources required to achieve the project objectives (this includes programme, expenditure and costs, risks, including any approvals and consents required, and project partners).
- Outputs The direct result of the activity, e.g. technological progress, or increased knowledge (this includes lessons learnt and any changes in approach)
- Outcomes The changes or benefits that result, generally to the direct beneficiaries of the project e.g. benefits to the environment resulting from the innovation (these are different for each project and will be based on the SMART outcomes included in the original entry)
- Impacts The final, wider changes that result from the programme (these are different for each project and will be based on the impacts included in the original entry)
Water cycle tags
Water Cycle Tags refer to specific parts of the water cycle. These have been updated in this round and you can see more information about them in this diagram:
We set out the questions that should be answered, along with guidance on completing the entry process in the Catalyst Stream Entrant Handbook (Key Materials).
All entries must have been submitted by 6 January 2026 at 12 noon (GMT) using the Catalyst online entry form available via the website. Any entry partner can submit this form, but it must include the details of the lead entrant. The lead entrant will be asked to verify the entry is theirs and confirm they have accepted the terms and conditions during the eligibility screen.
The entry form is available as a Word document (Entry drafting form) along with the entry template (budget) as an Excel document via the website to help you develop and collaborate on your answers before completing the online form.
If entrants wish to work on more than one draft on the online entry platform during the entry period, please contact [email protected] for assistance.
Before submitting your entry, please ensure that:
- You and your partners have read and understood the Challenge terms and conditions and privacy policy, including the Ofwat privacy policy.
- You have followed good procurement principles, performed your due diligence on your partners and accepted any risk and liability from going ahead with them.
- You and your entry partners have set out in your entry how a 10% minimum financial contribution will be provided for (at least 10% of total entry financial costs will be funded from sources other than the Fund).
B. Eligibility Screening
Entrants must meet the eligibility criteria set out in the Who can be involved section above.
When entries close, an eligibility screen will be conducted to ensure entries meet all the eligibility criteria.
C. Assessment
All eligible entries will be assessed by assessors against each of the following three assessment criteria categories:
- Positive impact for water customers, communities, and the environment.
- Innovation enablers and innovative solutions.
- Capacity, capability, and commitment to deliver.
Assessors will be matched to entries relevant to their area of expertise.
Scoring will be between 1 and 5 (5 being the highest). These scores are then weighted. The assessed entry questions, assessment criteria and weighting are set out in the Catalyst Stream Entrant Handbook (Key Materials).
A moderation meeting will be held to discuss and recommend shortlisted entries to put forward to judges. This moderation meeting will ensure that all assessors’ opinions have been captured and that a consistent view on the merits of each entry is provided.
Whilst scoring will form part of this process, in making its decision on whether to put forward an entry to judges, Ofwat will also consider the opinions of the assessors and will seek to ensure a diverse portfolio of entries in terms of entry themes, types, entrants and geographic location.
Pitch recordings
All entrants to the Catalyst stream are required to book a slot to record a 3-minute pitch video. The purpose of the pitch recording is to provide a video explainer to help assessors and judges quickly understand your entry.
Pitches should outline:
- The problem the entry aims to address and what benefits it will have for customers, communities and/or the environment if successful (around 25% of the pitch)
- What about the entry is innovative (around 25% of the pitch)
- What entrants intend to do within their entry, focusing on activities that will be undertaken (around 50% of the pitch)
Please note that the booking window is from 17 November to 18 December 2025. Slots are available from 18 November to 18 December 2025. Please book a slot via Calendly.
To promote equity, diversity and inclusion and reduce any potential bias in the entry process, we will continue to exclude speaker videos in pitch recordings for Breakthrough 6. Entrants are asked to present slides or other visuals whilst talking.
Drinking Water Inspectorate involvement
Entries that align with the Water Cycle tags Water Abstraction, storage, Clean water Treatment, or Water network (as selected by entrants in the entry form) may be referred to the Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI) for additional review. Entries that do not select these categories but still relate to drinking water may be flagged by assessors for DWI review. DWI’s views may in turn be provided to judges and Ofwat to aid their decision-making. All funding decisions will be made in accordance with the published assessment criteria.
Further information on the Water Cycle can be found under ‘More information and support for your entry’ in the Catalyst Stream Entrant Handbook (Key Materials).
Environment Agency involvement
Building on the work we have done with the DWI in Breakthrough 5, entries in Breakthrough 6 may be passed to the Environment Agency for review. This is to allow the Fund to make informed funding decisions and ensuring policy coherence. The Environment Agency’s views may in turn be provided to judges and Ofwat to aid their decision-making. All funding decisions will be made in accordance with the published assessment criteria.
D. Judging
An independent panel of judges will review the shortlisted entries put forward through the assessment. The judging panel will review the entries individually, scoring the entries using the same criteria as the assessors. The judging panel will then convene to discuss entries and recommend to Ofwat which entries they agree best meet the assessment criteria and offer a diverse portfolio for funding.
Breakthrough 6 will continue to offer the opportunity of a live Q&A session for the entrants to respond to judges’ questions as part of the entry process. Please note entrants will not be requested to pitch to the judges. Questions will not be provided to entry teams in advance to enable a more dynamic conversation.
Judges will ask questions relating to shortlisted entries during the judging days between 9 am and 5.30 pm (GMT) on 24, 25 or 26 March 2026. Q&A slots will be allocated to shortlisted entries no later than 11 March 2026, but where possible, we will endeavour to provide as much notice as possible.
If teams are not able to attend the live Q&A, they should notify the delivery partners at [email protected] as soon as possible, for a chance to answer the judges’ questions in writing. No other opportunities for questions and answers will be provided, with the exception of clarifying conflicting entry answers.
E. Ofwat Decision
Ofwat will make the final decision on which entries should receive funding. In making its decision, Ofwat will consider the views of assessors and judges on which entries best meet the assessment criteria and offer a diverse portfolio for funding.
Ofwat intends to publish this decision and its reasons for awarding funding. Ofwat will take account of entrants’ preferences regarding the confidentiality of their entries.
F. Award
Entries should expect to be notified if they have been awarded funding by late April 2026.
Winner’s Agreement
When notified, successful entries will receive a copy of their draft winner’s agreement. This winner’s agreement will be based on the standard template available via the website. Please note that this template is only provided for information purposes and may be subject to changes. Winning teams must sign these agreements no later than 5 pm (GMT) on 15 May 2026 to be paid by late June 2026.
A winners’ onboarding event will be held online on 9 June 2026, 1-3 pm (GMT).
Further information and a joining link will be shared with winning entries in the weeks ahead of the event.
G. Feedback
After winners have been announced, feedback will be provided to the main contacts and lead entrants who did not win funding, outlining why their entry was unsuccessful.
Feedback will be provided on each entry, in line with the assessment criteria and, where relevant, provide guidance on areas of improvement. The feedback will not include scores provided by the assessors and the judging panel. As mentioned above, scoring forms only a part of the overall assessment process.
Feedback will not be provided to winning entries.