Why the RPC matters – because independent scrutiny improves UK regulation
This is the final post in our series answering the simple but important question: why does the RPC matter?
This is the final post in our series answering the simple but important question: why does the RPC matter?
The report reflects on a very busy year with many changes for the RPC, including the completion of the transition to the revised Better Regulation Framework (BRF).
The RPC has published updates to its summaries of the ratings it gives impact assessments.
The RPC has published updates to its summaries of the ratings it gives impact assessments.
As the RPC publishes new case histories guidance on monitoring and evaluation, Caroline Elliott, RPC member and chair of the RPC Methodology Sub-group, explains the importance of incorporating M&E plans as regulation is developed.
Stephen Gibson and Caroline Elliott of the RPC set out some of the issues that governments face in making policy decisions when peoples' lives are involved.
The Regulatory Policy Committee welcomes four new members in April and says farewell and thank you to four current members.
The RPC welcomes the Government's new target to reduce the administrative costs of regulation on business by 25% by the end of the parliament.
The Government’s Better Regulation Framework (BRF) is designed to ensure that Ministers, and subsequently Parliament, have robust evidence and analysis of the impacts of new regulations before they are introduced. However too often departments have not been submitting Impact Assessments …
Stephen Gibson, Chair of the RPC, commends Defra on progress on completing PIRs but expresses ongoing concerns from others across government.